2009 Audi TT vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Audi TT would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (168 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2012 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Epica.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (350 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | TT | Epica |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1968 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 350 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.3 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |