2009 Audi TT vs. 2012 Mazda 2
To start off, 2012 Mazda 2 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Audi TT would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (247 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 2012 Mazda 2. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda 2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mazda 2. (119 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 2012 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | TT | 2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 1349 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 119 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2489 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 43 L |