2009 Audi TT vs. 2012 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2012 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Audi TT would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2009 Audi TT. (268 HP @ 2500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi TT.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Mazda CX-9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi TT. (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi TT. 2012 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 2009 Audi TT has manual transmission. 2009 Audi TT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 2012 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | TT | CX-9 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 2500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 5085 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 76 L |