2009 Audi TT vs. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Audi TT would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi TT weights approximately 200 kg more than 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Audi TT | 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
| Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
| Model | TT | i-MiEV |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 3678 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1585 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1615 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2550 mm |
