2009 Audi TT vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Audi TT would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 50 kg more than 2009 Audi TT.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi TT (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2009 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Audi | Mini |
Model | TT | Countryman |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1335 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 47 L |