2009 Audi TT vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Audi TT would be higher.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 370 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi TT. (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi TT. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom has automatic transmission and 2009 Audi TT has manual transmission. 2009 Audi TT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi TT | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Audi | Rolls-Royce |
Model | TT | Phantom |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 2500 RPM | 5350 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 720 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 84 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 8-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 5612 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1987 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1598 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 100 L |