2009 Bentley Arnage vs. 2006 Bentley Continental
To start off, 2009 Bentley Arnage is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Bentley Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Bentley Continental would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Bentley Arnage is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Bentley Arnage weights approximately 135 kg more than 2006 Bentley Continental.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 875 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Bentley Arnage | 2006 Bentley Continental | |
Make | Bentley | Bentley |
Model | Arnage | Continental |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 6748 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 450 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 875 Nm | 875 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 104.2 mm | 104 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.1 mm | 99 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2585 kg | 2450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3120 mm | 3070 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 19.5 L/100km | 20.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 96 L | 100 L |