2009 Bentley Arnage vs. 2013 Ferrari California
To start off, 2013 Ferrari California is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Bentley Arnage. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Bentley Arnage would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Bentley Arnage (738 Nm) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ferrari California. (504 Nm). This means 2009 Bentley Arnage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ferrari California. 2009 Bentley Arnage has automatic transmission and 2013 Ferrari California has manual transmission. 2013 Ferrari California will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Bentley Arnage will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Bentley Arnage | 2013 Ferrari California | |
Make | Bentley | Ferrari |
Model | Arnage | California |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 493 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 738 Nm | 504 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 104.2 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.1 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5410 mm | 4562 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2130 mm | 1902 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1308 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3120 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 78 L |