2009 Bentley Azure vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Bentley Azure. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Bentley Azure would be higher. In terms of performance, 2009 Bentley Azure (493 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 2013 Lotus Evora. (345 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Bentley Azure should accelerate faster than 2013 Lotus Evora.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Bentley Azure (738 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 338 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Lotus Evora. (400 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Bentley Azure will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Lotus Evora. 2009 Bentley Azure has automatic transmission and 2013 Lotus Evora has manual transmission. 2013 Lotus Evora will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Bentley Azure will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Bentley Azure | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
Make | Bentley | Lotus |
Model | Azure | Evora |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 493 HP | 345 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 738 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5410 mm | 4361 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1229 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3120 mm | 2575 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 19.6 L/100km | 14.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 96 L | 60 L |