2009 Bentley Brooklands vs. 2005 Chrysler Pacifica
To start off, 2009 Bentley Brooklands is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler Pacifica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler Pacifica would be higher. At 6,761 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Bentley Brooklands is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Bentley Brooklands (530 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 280 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler Pacifica. (250 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Bentley Brooklands should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler Pacifica.
Because 2005 Chrysler Pacifica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Bentley Brooklands. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Pacifica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Bentley Brooklands (1,050 Nm) has 711 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler Pacifica. (339 Nm). This means 2009 Bentley Brooklands will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler Pacifica.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Bentley Brooklands | 2005 Chrysler Pacifica | |
Make | Bentley | Chrysler |
Model | Brooklands | Pacifica |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6761 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 530 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 1050 Nm | 339 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3120 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 16.8 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 23.5 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 21.4 L/100km | 12.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 96 L | 87 L |