2009 Bentley Continental GT vs. 1983 Renault 5
To start off, 2009 Bentley Continental GT is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Renault 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Renault 5 would be higher. At 5,998 cc, 2009 Bentley Continental GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Bentley Continental GT (552 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 392 more horse power than 1983 Renault 5. (160 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Bentley Continental GT should accelerate faster than 1983 Renault 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Bentley Continental GT weights approximately 1413 kg more than 1983 Renault 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Bentley Continental GT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Renault 5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Bentley Continental GT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Bentley Continental GT (650 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 429 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Renault 5. (221 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2009 Bentley Continental GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Renault 5. 2009 Bentley Continental GT has automatic transmission and 1983 Renault 5 has manual transmission. 1983 Renault 5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Bentley Continental GT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Bentley Continental GT | 1983 Renault 5 | |
Make | Bentley | Renault |
Model | Continental GT | 5 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5998 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Type | W | in-line |
Horse Power | 552 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 650 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.2 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 7.0:1 |
Top Speed | 318 km/hour | 209 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 4.8 seconds | 6.6 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2385 kg | 972 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 51 L |