2009 Bentley Continental GTC vs. 1953 Ferrari 212

To start off, 2009 Bentley Continental GTC is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ferrari 212. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ferrari 212 would be higher. At 5,997 cc, 2009 Bentley Continental GTC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Bentley Continental GTC (592 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 429 more horse power than 1953 Ferrari 212. (163 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Bentley Continental GTC should accelerate faster than 1953 Ferrari 212. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Bentley Continental GTC weights approximately 1710 kg more than 1953 Ferrari 212. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Bentley Continental GTC 1953 Ferrari 212
Make Bentley Ferrari
Model Continental GTC 212
Year Released 2009 1953
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5997 cc 2562 cc
Engine Type W in-line
Valves per Cylinder 3 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 592 HP 163 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Number of Seats 4 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 2585 kg 875 kg
Vehicle Length 5400 mm 4210 mm
Vehicle Height 1520 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 3120 mm 2260 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 90 L 159 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]