2009 Bentley Continental GTC vs. 1972 TVR 1600
To start off, 2009 Bentley Continental GTC is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 TVR 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 TVR 1600 would be higher. At 5,997 cc, 2009 Bentley Continental GTC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Bentley Continental GTC (592 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 508 more horse power than 1972 TVR 1600. (84 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Bentley Continental GTC should accelerate faster than 1972 TVR 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Bentley Continental GTC weights approximately 1689 kg more than 1972 TVR 1600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Bentley Continental GTC is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 TVR 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Bentley Continental GTC will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Bentley Continental GTC (553 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 428 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 TVR 1600. (125 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Bentley Continental GTC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 TVR 1600. 2009 Bentley Continental GTC has automatic transmission and 1972 TVR 1600 has manual transmission. 1972 TVR 1600 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Bentley Continental GTC will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Bentley Continental GTC | 1972 TVR 1600 | |
Make | Bentley | TVR |
Model | Continental GTC | 1600 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5997 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Type | W | in-line |
Horse Power | 592 HP | 84 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 553 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 104.2 mm | 81.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.1 mm | 77.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2585 kg | 896 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3120 mm | 2290 mm |