2009 BMW 116 vs. 1959 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 2009 BMW 116 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Jeep CJ5 (135 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2009 BMW 116. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Jeep CJ5 should accelerate faster than 2009 BMW 116. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW 116 weights approximately 345 kg more than 1959 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1959 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 BMW 116. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Jeep CJ5 (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW 116. (151 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 1959 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW 116.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 116 | 1959 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 116 | CJ5 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 3687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 151 Nm | 325 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4300 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1440 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2060 mm |