2009 BMW 116 vs. 2000 Seat Arosa
To start off, 2009 BMW 116 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Seat Arosa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Seat Arosa would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 BMW 116 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Seat Arosa (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2009 BMW 116. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa should accelerate faster than 2009 BMW 116. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW 116 weights approximately 236 kg more than 2000 Seat Arosa.
Because 2009 BMW 116 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW 116. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 116 (150 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Seat Arosa. (117 Nm). This means 2009 BMW 116 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Seat Arosa.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 116 | 2000 Seat Arosa | |
Make | BMW | Seat |
Model | 116 | Arosa |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 117 Nm |
Top Speed | 200 km/hour | 157 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1289 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2850 mm |