2009 BMW 120 vs. 1954 Buick 40
To start off, 2009 BMW 120 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,328 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 120 (175 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1954 Buick 40. (141 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 120 should accelerate faster than 1954 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Buick 40 weights approximately 349 kg more than 2009 BMW 120.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 120 (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Buick 40. (309 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 BMW 120 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 120 | 1954 Buick 40 | |
Make | BMW | Buick |
Model | 120 | 40 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 4328 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 309 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1675 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3110 mm |