2009 BMW 120 vs. 2002 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2009 BMW 120 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 120 (169 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ranger. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 120 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 335 kg more than 2009 BMW 120.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 BMW 120. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 120 (210 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ranger. (207 Nm). This means 2009 BMW 120 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 120 | 2002 Ford Ranger | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 120 | Ranger |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 169 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 6700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 207 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 55 L |