2009 BMW 120 vs. 2004 Ford Ranger

To start off, 2009 BMW 120 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2009 BMW 120. (175 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2009 BMW 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW 120 weights approximately 317 kg more than 2004 Ford Ranger.

Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 BMW 120. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 120 (350 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Ranger. (323 Nm). This means 2009 BMW 120 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Ranger.

Compare all specifications:

2009 BMW 120 2004 Ford Ranger
Make BMW Ford
Model 120 Ranger
Year Released 2009 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1995 cc 4015 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 175 HP 207 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 350 Nm 323 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 16.0:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1525 kg 1208 kg
Vehicle Length 4370 mm 5130 mm
Vehicle Width 1430 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1760 mm 1730 mm
Wheelbase Size 2670 mm 3200 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 5.5 L/100km 14.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 51 L 74 L