2009 BMW 120 vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2009 BMW 120 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 2009 BMW 120. (168 HP @ 6700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2009 BMW 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 749 kg more than 2009 BMW 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 312 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW 120. (210 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW 120.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 120 | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
Make | BMW | Nissan |
Model | 120 | Armada |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 6700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 98.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 2274 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 106 L |