2009 BMW 125 vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2009 BMW 125 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 125 (215 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 125 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 704 kg more than 2009 BMW 125.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 BMW 125 | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 125 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 2030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 5690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 75 L |
