2009 BMW 125 vs. 1964 Zastava 1500
To start off, 2009 BMW 125 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW 125 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 125 (215 HP) has 162 more horse power than 1964 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 125 should accelerate faster than 1964 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW 125 weights approximately 342 kg more than 1964 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 125 (250 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 BMW 125 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 125 | 1964 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | BMW | Zastava |
Model | 125 | 1500 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 250 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 984 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2430 mm |