2009 BMW 128 vs. 1990 Renault Alpine
To start off, 2009 BMW 128 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Renault Alpine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Renault Alpine would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW 128 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 128 (231 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1990 Renault Alpine. (182 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 128 should accelerate faster than 1990 Renault Alpine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Renault Alpine (290 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW 128. (271 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1990 Renault Alpine will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW 128.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 128 | 1990 Renault Alpine | |
Make | BMW | Renault |
Model | 128 | Alpine |
Year Released | 2009 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 2458 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 231 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 290 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 91.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 63 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 16.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.4 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 13.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 72 L |