2009 BMW 128 vs. 1992 Volvo 440
To start off, 2009 BMW 128 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Volvo 440. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Volvo 440 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW 128 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 128 (231 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1992 Volvo 440. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 128 should accelerate faster than 1992 Volvo 440.
Because 2009 BMW 128 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW 128. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Volvo 440, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 128 (271 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Volvo 440. (175 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2009 BMW 128 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Volvo 440.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 128 | 1992 Volvo 440 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | 128 | 440 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 1721 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 231 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 16.0:1 | 8.1:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 8.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 60 L |