2009 BMW 130 vs. 2004 Daihatsu Copen
To start off, 2009 BMW 130 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Daihatsu Copen. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Daihatsu Copen would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 BMW 130 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 130 (261 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 2004 Daihatsu Copen. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 130 should accelerate faster than 2004 Daihatsu Copen. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW 130 weights approximately 470 kg more than 2004 Daihatsu Copen. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 BMW 130 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW 130. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Daihatsu Copen, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 130 (315 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Daihatsu Copen. (100 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 BMW 130 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Daihatsu Copen. 2009 BMW 130 has automatic transmission and 2004 Daihatsu Copen has manual transmission. 2004 Daihatsu Copen will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 BMW 130 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 130 | 2004 Daihatsu Copen | |
Make | BMW | Daihatsu |
Model | 130 | Copen |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 659 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 261 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 315 Nm | 100 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.7:1 | 8.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.6 L/100km | 4.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 43 L |