2009 BMW 135 vs. 1951 Cadillac 62

To start off, 2009 BMW 135 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 135 (302 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1951 Cadillac 62. (160 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 135 should accelerate faster than 1951 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 227 kg more than 2009 BMW 135.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Cadillac 62 (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW 135. (400 Nm @ 1300 RPM). This means 1951 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW 135.

Compare all specifications:

2009 BMW 135 1951 Cadillac 62
Make BMW Cadillac
Model 135 62
Year Released 2009 1951
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2978 cc 5422 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 302 HP 160 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 3800 RPM
Torque 400 Nm 423 Nm
Torque RPM 1300 RPM 1800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 84 mm 96.8 mm
Engine Stroke Size 89.6 mm 92.1 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.2:1 6.7:1
Top Speed 250 km/hour 145 km/hour
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1525 kg 1752 kg
Vehicle Length 4370 mm 5480 mm
Vehicle Width 1420 mm 2050 mm
Vehicle Height 1760 mm 1600 mm
Wheelbase Size 2670 mm 3210 mm