2009 BMW 135 vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2009 BMW 135 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 135 (302 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 135 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 755 kg more than 2009 BMW 135.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 135 | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 135 | 62 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 7028 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 2075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 5680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 79 L |