2009 BMW 135 vs. 1992 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2009 BMW 135 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,992 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Jaguar XJR (333 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2009 BMW 135. (300 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2009 BMW 135. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 498 kg more than 2009 BMW 135. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Jaguar XJR (495 Nm @ 3650 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW 135. (407 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 1992 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW 135. 1992 Jaguar XJR has automatic transmission and 2009 BMW 135 has manual transmission. 2009 BMW 135 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Jaguar XJR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 BMW 135 | 1992 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | 135 | XJR |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2979 cc | 5992 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 333 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 495 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3650 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 254 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 5.3 seconds | 6.8 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1824 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 21.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 89 L |
