2009 BMW 135 vs. 2000 Jeep Varsity
To start off, 2009 BMW 135 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jeep Varsity. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jeep Varsity would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jeep Varsity is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jeep Varsity weights approximately 222 kg more than 2009 BMW 135.
Because 2000 Jeep Varsity is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 BMW 135. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Varsity will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 135 (400 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Jeep Varsity. (346 Nm). This means 2009 BMW 135 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Jeep Varsity.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 BMW 135 | 2000 Jeep Varsity | |
| Make | BMW | Jeep |
| Model | 135 | Varsity |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2979 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 302 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 346 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 209 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1542 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2800 mm |
