2009 BMW 135 vs. 2005 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2009 BMW 135 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2009 BMW 135. (300 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2009 BMW 135. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1062 kg more than 2009 BMW 135. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW 135. (407 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW 135.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 135 | 2005 Nissan Armada | |
Make | BMW | Nissan |
Model | 135 | Armada |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 2388 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 106 L |