2009 BMW 316 vs. 1965 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 2009 BMW 316 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 3,522 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Pontiac Tempest (118 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2009 BMW 316. (113 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 2009 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Pontiac Tempest weights approximately 30 kg more than 2009 BMW 316. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 BMW 316 | 1965 Pontiac Tempest | |
| Make | BMW | Pontiac |
| Model | 316 | Tempest |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 3522 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 113 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2930 mm |
