2009 BMW 316 vs. 1968 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2009 BMW 316 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,550 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (213 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2009 BMW 316. (113 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2009 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 265 kg more than 2009 BMW 316. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 316 | 1968 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 316 | Fairlane |
Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 6550 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 213 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 5110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2960 mm |