2009 BMW 316 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado
To start off, 2009 BMW 316 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2009 BMW 316. (113 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 2009 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 143 kg more than 2009 BMW 316. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW 316. (175 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW 316.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 316 | 2004 Chevrolet Colorado | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 316 | Colorado |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2770 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1518 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 74 L |