2009 BMW 316 vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 BMW 316 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Ecosport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Ecosport would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 BMW 316 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 316 (113 HP) has 46 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 316 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2009 BMW 316 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW 316. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 BMW 316 | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | 316 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 113 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2490 mm |
