2009 BMW 316 vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2009 BMW 316 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia K2700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia K2700 would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 316 (113 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 316 should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 155 kg more than 2009 BMW 316.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 175 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 316 | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
Make | BMW | Kia |
Model | 316 | K2700 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2665 cc |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4150 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.1 mm | 94.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 95 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1530 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 60 L |