2009 BMW 320 vs. 1964 Citroen Ak 350
To start off, 2009 BMW 320 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 BMW 320 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 320 (141 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen Ak 350.
Because 2009 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Citroen Ak 350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 320 (190 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 320 | 1964 Citroen Ak 350 | |
Make | BMW | Citroen |
Model | 320 | Ak 350 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 602 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 22 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 41 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 7.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 63 L |