2009 BMW 320 vs. 1979 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2009 BMW 320 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 BMW 320 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 320 (141 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1979 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 1979 Zastava 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 320 (190 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2009 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 320 | 1979 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | BMW | Zastava |
Model | 320 | 1300 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1979 |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2430 mm |