2009 BMW 320 vs. 1982 Chrysler E
To start off, 2009 BMW 320 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 320 (141 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E.
Because 2009 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 320 (190 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 320 | 1982 Chrysler E | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | 320 | E |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 179 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2630 mm |