2009 BMW 320 vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt

To start off, 2009 BMW 320 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 BMW 320 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW 320 weights approximately 770 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.

Because 2009 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2009 BMW 320 1982 Mitsubishi Colt
Make BMW Mitsubishi
Model 320 Colt
Year Released 2009 1982
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1995 cc 1244 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 148 HP 0 HP
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Vehicle Weight 1580 kg 810 kg
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 3800 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1590 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2310 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]