2009 BMW 320 vs. 1992 Chrysler ES
To start off, 2009 BMW 320 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 320 (141 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1992 Chrysler ES. (139 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 1992 Chrysler ES.
Because 2009 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chrysler ES (232 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW 320. (190 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1992 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW 320.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 320 | 1992 Chrysler ES | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | 320 | ES |
Year Released | 2009 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2470 mm |