2009 BMW 320 vs. 1998 Acura EL
To start off, 2009 BMW 320 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Acura EL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Acura EL would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 BMW 320 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 320 (141 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1998 Acura EL. (127 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 1998 Acura EL.
Because 2009 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 320 (190 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Acura EL. (145 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2009 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Acura EL.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 320 | 1998 Acura EL | |
Make | BMW | Acura |
Model | 320 | EL |
Year Released | 2009 | 1998 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4478 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1704 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2619 mm |