2009 BMW 320 vs. 2000 GMC Safari
To start off, 2009 BMW 320 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Safari would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 GMC Safari (190 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2009 BMW 320. (175 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 GMC Safari should accelerate faster than 2009 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Safari weights approximately 431 kg more than 2009 BMW 320. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 320 (350 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 GMC Safari. (319 Nm). This means 2009 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 GMC Safari.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 320 | 2000 GMC Safari | |
Make | BMW | GMC |
Model | 320 | Safari |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 350 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1956 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2830 mm |