2009 BMW 320 vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile
To start off, 2009 BMW 320 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile Profile would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile (206 HP) has 65 more horse power than 2009 BMW 320. (141 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile should accelerate faster than 2009 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile weights approximately 35 kg more than 2009 BMW 320. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 BMW 320. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile (353 Nm) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW 320. (191 Nm). This means 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW 320.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 320 | 2000 Oldsmobile Profile | |
Make | BMW | Oldsmobile |
Model | 320 | Profile |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 206 HP |
Torque | 191 Nm | 353 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2880 mm |