2009 BMW 320 vs. 2001 Daewoo Vada
To start off, 2009 BMW 320 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Daewoo Vada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Daewoo Vada would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 BMW 320 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 320 (141 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 2001 Daewoo Vada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW 320 weights approximately 212 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Vada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Vada, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 320 (191 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (144 Nm). This means 2009 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Vada.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 320 | 2001 Daewoo Vada | |
Make | BMW | Daewoo |
Model | 320 | Vada |
Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 191 Nm | 144 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1313 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2530 mm |