2009 BMW 320 vs. 2001 Ford F-650
To start off, 2009 BMW 320 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford F-650. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford F-650 would be higher. At 7,300 cc, 2001 Ford F-650 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 320 (175 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2001 Ford F-650. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford F-650. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW 320 weights approximately 87 kg more than 2001 Ford F-650. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford F-650, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford F-650 (1,166 Nm) has 815 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW 320. (351 Nm). This means 2001 Ford F-650 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW 320.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 320 | 2001 Ford F-650 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 320 | F-650 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 7300 cc |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 351 Nm | 1166 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 1298 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 4930 mm |