2009 BMW 320 vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2009 BMW 320 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Suzuki F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Suzuki F1 would be higher. Both 2009 BMW 320 and 2002 Suzuki F1 are equipped with a 1,995 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 320 (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW 320 weights approximately 110 kg more than 2002 Suzuki F1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 320 (331 Nm) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 2009 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 BMW 320 | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
| Make | BMW | Suzuki |
| Model | 320 | F1 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 331 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1470 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 45 L |
