2009 BMW 320 vs. 2004 Jeep Wrangler

To start off, 2009 BMW 320 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2009 BMW 320. (141 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2009 BMW 320.

Because 2004 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 BMW 320. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW 320. (190 Nm). This means 2004 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW 320.

Compare all specifications:

2009 BMW 320 2004 Jeep Wrangler
Make BMW Jeep
Model 320 Wrangler
Year Released 2009 2004
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1995 cc 3966 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 141 HP 190 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 3800 RPM
Torque 190 Nm 319 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 12.0:1 8.8:1
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4540 mm 3950 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1810 mm
Wheelbase Size 2770 mm 2380 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 6 L/100km 13.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 72 L