2009 BMW 320 vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2009 BMW 320 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 BMW 320 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 320 (141 HP) has 71 more horse power than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 320 (190 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2009 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 320 | 2004 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | BMW | MCC |
Model | 320 | Crossblade |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 1810 mm |