2009 BMW 320 vs. 2005 Ford Ranger

To start off, 2009 BMW 320 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 148 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW 320 weights approximately 172 kg more than 2005 Ford Ranger.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 320 (330 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (250 Nm). This means 2009 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger.

Compare all specifications:

2009 BMW 320 2005 Ford Ranger
Make BMW Ford
Model 320 Ranger
Year Released 2009 2005
Body Type Hatchback Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1995 cc 2983 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 148 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 330 Nm 250 Nm
Engine Bore Size 84 mm 89.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90 mm 80 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 17.0:1 9.6:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 3 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1470 kg 1298 kg
Vehicle Length 4270 mm 4790 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1690 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2620 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 5.8 L/100km 11.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 64 L