2009 BMW 320 vs. 2007 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 BMW 320 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Holden Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Holden Epica would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 BMW 320 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 320 (175 HP) has 27 more horse power than 2007 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 2007 Holden Epica.
Because 2009 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 320 (351 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 2009 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 320 | 2007 Holden Epica | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | 320 | Epica |
Year Released | 2009 | 2007 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 351 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |