2009 BMW 320 vs. 2008 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2009 BMW 320 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 320 (175 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2008 Jeep Wrangler. (172 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 2008 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 BMW 320. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 320 (350 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2009 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2009 BMW 320 | 2008 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 320 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 3979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 172 HP |
Torque | 350 Nm | 319 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 5.6 seconds | 12.6 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6 L/100km | 14.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 72 L |